#Program diagram architecture oma code
#Program diagram architecture oma free

Mnogi od njih često imaju i vrlo ambivalentan odnos prema zadacima koji su pred njih postavljeni, te načinu na koji se njihovi projekti realizuju, ali ipak uspevaju da iznesu svoje ideje onako kako su ih zamislili. Međutim, ono što je daleko zanimljivije jeste društvo koje je iznedrilo takvu arhitekturu, i omogućilo pojavu i delovanje niza autora i autorskih timova izvanrednog talenta, a koji su to društvo uprostorili. Danas je ova arhitektura u novom talasu interesovanja i zadobija novu, globalnu popularnost i publiku koja prati stare „veličanstvene ruine“, da li će se i kako rekonstruisati i kako će se u njima živeti i raditi u budućnosti. Istorijske okolnosti na međunarodnom planu dovode do specifičnog jugoslovenskog ekcepcionalizma, koji omogućuje samoupravljanje na unutrašnjem, a nesvrstanost na spoljnom političkom planu – što je stvorilo posebnu klimu za razvoj eksperimenta u arhitekturi koji pleni tihu pažnju međunarodne stručne javnosti od samog nastanka. Jugoslavija nije izuzetak – štaviše, zemlja beleži istorijske rekorde u rastu privrede i posledično, ulaganjima u infrastrukturu svake vrste. Prvih decenija po završetku Drugog svetskog rata, zemlje širom sveta beleže ogroman zamah izgradnje u svim mogućim razmerama i najrazličitijim tipologijama. The last part examines the form and the function of other architect’s projects that applied the social condenser concept to catalyze the community.

The second part examines Narkomfin (20) by Moisei’s grandson who not only recovers the building but also designs a new purpose and perspective on the old building principle.

The first part examines Narkomfin(1930), Moscow, one of the masterpieces of Murauskis to understand his initial concept and purpose of building within the community. (How do Aleksander Ginzburg and Moisej’s nephew redefine the Narkomfin as a social condenser? What do they recover or restore?) I also investigated other architects who implement the social condenser ideal in today’s world and questioned, Why do social condensers continue to be produced in the modern world? The paper examines the topic in three sections: Study of original Narkomfin in 1930 (1), Revolution of Narkomfin from 2016 to 2020 (2), and Murawskis’s concept that influenced modern architects (3). My paper will look at the meaning and purpose of social condensers by investigating the revolution of Narkomfin by Moisej Ginzburg and Ignatij Milinis, and comparing their latter generation aspects. However, the terms of social condenser have been redefined over time by architects, and this concept potentially enhances equality and interaction for people in society. The main objective of the paper is to show how Deleuze and Guattari’s claim that functionality is a product of a territory, rather than the more conventional inverse becomes apparent in the proposal by OMA for the Parc de La Villette.Since the late 1920s, Constructivists and architects have promoted the notion of the Social Condenser and it has become one of the most powerful architectural concepts produced in the Soviet Union until nowadays. What constitutes the innovation of OMA’s proposal for the Parc de La Villette is the interconnection between territorial and programmatic aspects of the project through a common visualisation tool, which was the diagram of stripes. Special attention will be paid to the way OMA treated the park as a programmatic entity.

#Program diagram architecture oma code

My presentation will aim to use the disjunction between code and territory and the distinction between milieu and territory, as understood by Deleuze and Guattari, in order to interpret how the notions of territory and program were interrelated in the case of the entry to the competition for the Parc de La Villette by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA).

They also explain how “perpetual transcoding between milieus”, which each one is characterised by its one code, takes place and highlight that the territory emerges through a process of decoding.

#Program diagram architecture oma free

They sustain that “he territory arises in a free margin of the code, one that is not indeterminate but rather is determined differently” and draw a d istinction between milieu and territory.

Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, in A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, shed light on the disjunction between code and territory.